Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension

By Michael Minkov, G. Hofstede. 2012

271 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e9bb9547ddf962fb32289324480c65a0c356bc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Michael Minkov
2. M. Bond

In Social Psychology

1. Janar Jandosova
2. Ben Mudd
3. Michael Schachner
4. Yerlan Khassenbekov
5. Oswaldo Morales
6. Carlos Sánchez
7. P. Dutt
8. M. Bond

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Janar Jandosova
2. Ben Mudd
3. Michael Schachner
4. Yerlan Khassenbekov
5. Oswaldo Morales
6. Carlos Sánchez
7. P. Dutt
8. M. Bond

Citations in the corpus

• A Reconsideration of Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Flexibility Versus Monumentalism Data From 54 Countries (2018, methodology): “The “obedience” item (coded v21) is highly and negatively associated with LTO in Minkov and Hofstede (2012): r = –.69 (p = .001, n = 21).”
• A revision of Hofstede’s model of national culture: old evidence and new data from 56 countries (2017, methodology): “Minkov and Hofstede (2012) showed that their LTO measure predicted national differences in educational achievement.”