Hollow selection by vertebrate fauna in forests of southeastern Australia and implications for forest management
By Phillip B. Gibbons, David B. Lindenmayer, Simon C. Barry, M. Tanton. 2002
154 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e9273920f2cf79380f0ec432df438d58dddaff0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Insect Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Cavity characteristics, but not habitat, influence nest survival of cavity-nesting birds along a gradient of human impact in the subtropical Atlantic Forest (2015, background): “To decide which trees to target, managers and policy-makers must often rely on studies of nest-site selection (e.g. Lindenmayer et al., 1990; Gibbons et al., 2002; Cameron, 2006).”
- Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian birds and bats (2009, background): “Trees with fire scars are more likely to contain hollows (Taylor and Haseler 1993) or more hollows (Whitford 2002) and hollows in trees with fire scars are more likely to be occupied by birds and mammals than those without scars (Gibbons et al. 2002).”