Changing industrial structure to reduce carbon dioxide emissions: a Chinese application
By N. Chang. 2015
188 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e8dffc34f40aa75bce623cc9d61b835078b14f8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Multi-criteria model for sustainable development using goal programming applied to the United Arab Emirates (2015, methodology): “Diakoulaki et al. (2005) discuss the evolution of MCDA approaches, in the context of the emerging problems faced by energy planners and other stakeholders in energy planning and related decision situations.”
- Does industrial upgrading promote eco-efficiency? ─A panel space estimation based on Chinese evidence (2021, background): “…of the industrial structure change, not only failing to consider the different effects of industrial rationalization and supererogation, but also missing out on the influence of industrial rationalization and supererogation1 on the eco-efficiency (Tian et al., 2014; Chang, 2015; Li et al., 2017).”
- Industrial structure, technological progress and CO2 emissions in China: Analysis based on the STIRPAT framework (2017, background): “Proper factor allocations and resource flows among industries promote regional input–output efficiencies and thereby reduce carbon emissions (Chang 2015).”
- Structural transformation of manufacturing, natural resource dependence, and carbon emissions reduction: Evidence of a threshold effect from China (2019, background): “The transformation of industrial structure is affected by many factors such as GNP per capita, technology, etc (Baldwin et al., 2005, Chang, 2015).”