The Future of Criminal Attitudes Research and Practice

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mental Disorder and Offending in Prison (2012, background): “Simourd and Oliver (2002), for example, found that inmates with MDO exhibited higher scores on a scale measuring criminogenic thinking than other inmates, including negative attitudes toward the justice system, tolerance for law violations, and identification with criminal others.”
Risk-Appraisal Versus Self-Report in the Prediction of Criminal Justice Outcomes (2006, background): “Attempts were also made to keep the CSS as theoretically pure as possible by limiting scale content to items that described antisocial attitudes and beliefs construed as instrumental in supporting and facilitating criminal activity (Simourd & Olver, 2002).”
An Assessment for Criminal Thinking (2006, background): “As Simourd and Olver (2002) pointed out, however, criminal attitudes and thinking remain a neglected aspect of offender assessment and treatment.”
Reoffending After Release (2016, methodology): “According to Tyler’s (2003) process-based model of regulation, procedural justice directly and indirectly affects whether or not persons comply with the law and authorities’ rules and directives.”
The Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) (2004, methodology): “Factor analysis of the CSS-M scales individually produced four factors (Simourd & Olver, 2002).”