Dominance in domestic dogs: Useful construct or bad habit?

By J. Bradshaw, E. Blackwell, R. Casey. 2008

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e6082eb35e3b2d2933c80bda0d495207a5402c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. C. Clark
2. N. Rooney
3. R. Casey

In Genetics

1. R. Casey
2. P. Valsecchi
3. C. Clark
4. N. Rooney
5. Stéphanie Deldalle
6. Florence Gaunet

Citations in the corpus

• Dominance in relation to age, sex, and competitive contexts in a group of free-ranging domestic dogs (2010, background): “The main result is that the dominance relationships among dogs were not distributed randomly in our group: Conversely to what asserted from other authors (Boitani et al. 2007; Bradshaw et al. 2009), we found a significant linear dominance hierarchy, although the level of linearity was not elevated.”
• Minimizing fear and anxiety in working dogs: A review (2016, background): “There are still some trainers who use coercive approaches based on a “dominance” approach to interpreting dog behavior (Bradshaw et al., 2009), and rough handling remains common in specific disciplines and organizations (Haverbeke et al.”