Come, let's play - scenario-based programming using LSCs and the play-engine

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: A Research Roadmap (2009, background): “Scenario-based notations generally do not explicitly support adaptation either, although live sequence charts [16] have a notion of mandatory versus potential behaviour that could possibly be used to specify adaptive systems.”
Requirements Coverage as an Adequacy Measure for Conformance Testing (2008, methodology): “Combining a state-based testing technique for classes or class clusters modeled with statecharts [8], with a black-box testing technique, category partition testing, proved significantly more effective in fault detection.”
Process Mining (2016, methodology): “Inspired by the terminology used by David Harel in the context of Live Sequence Charts [70], we use the terms Play-In, Play-Out, and Replay to reflect on this relation.”
The minority report: some common assumptions to reconsider in the modelling of the brain and behaviour (2016, background): “16 A recently developed graphical computational formalism related to statecharts, Live Sequence Charts (Damm & Harel, 2001; Harel & Marelly, 2003), may be particularly well-suited for modelling complex sequential behaviour, as conjectured by Kolodny and Edelman (2015).”
Taming Dr. Frankenstein: Contract-Based Design for Cyber-Physical Systems (2012, background): “This consists in what David Harel called “playing out” for the particular case of live sequence charts [20], [21], [22], i.”