The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life
By R. Hays, L. Morales. Annals medicus, 2001
1,450 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e59aa7422233839a129afd0fe148f545f3168ac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Geriatrics and Gerontology
In Health
- C. Drossaert
- Robert Böhm
- Cindy Holtmann
- L. Korn
- P. Schmid
- Dorothee Heinemeier
- Cornelia Betsch
- R. van der Vaart
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination (2018, methodology): “Perceived health status was surveyed with the General Health Perceptions scale [83].”
- Analyzing the mediators between nature-based outdoor recreation and emotional well-being (2014, methodology): “RAND 36 is awidely used health-related quality of life survey instrument that has been validated in several countries (Hays & Morales, 2001).”
- Development of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument: Measuring a Broad Spectrum of Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 Skills (2017, methodology): “We measured health status with 3 subscales of the Dutch version of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36), namely General Health Perceptions, Physical Functioning, and Emotional Well-being [32-34].”
- Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. (2008, neutral): “ACE inhibitor 669 (58) 668 (64) 536 (64) 284 (66) 680 (60) 633 (62) 522 (62) 260 (62) ARB 48 (4) 93 (9) 104 (12) 49 (11) 54 (5) 99 (10) 108 (13) 67 (16) Statin 992 (86) 972 (93) 780 (93) 398 (93) 1014 (89) 972 (95) 769 (92) 386 (93) Other anti-lipid 89 (8) 236 (23) 324 (39) 211 (49) 94 (8) 253 (25) ”