A meta-analysis examining clinical predictors of hippocampal volume in patients with major depressive disorder.

By M. McKinnon, K. Yucel, A. Nazarov, Glenda Macqueen. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 2009

748 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND Some, although not all, studies report small hippocampal volume in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) relative to healthy controls. Here, we explore the contribution of key demographic and clinical variables to this difference. METHODS We used meta-analytic techniques to provide an updated analysis of data from 32 magnetic resonance imaging studies of hippocampal volume in patients with MDD. RESULTS Our analysis confirmed the difference in hippocampal volume, but only among patients with MDD whose duration of illness was longer than 2 years or who had more than 1 disease episode. We found no such effect in studies that included patients who did not fit these criteria. The effect was limited to children and middle-aged or older adults. Analyzed collectively, studies including young adult patients showed equivalent hippocampal volumes across MDD patients and controls, a result that may be attributable to a reduced burden of illness in this population. Age at onset of disease, severity of depression at the time of scanning, sex and slice thickness did not contribute to differences in hippocampal volume between patients with MDD and controls. LIMITATIONS The small size of many of the clinical and demographic subgroups may have limited statistical power to detect between-group differences. CONCLUSION Although all studies were cross-sectional, our results suggest that hippocampal volume reductions generally occur after disease onset in patients with MDD. These findings have implications for the timing of clinical interventions aimed at reducing the impact of MDD on neuronal structure and function.

Subfields: Behavioral Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e5007ba2e8883c261af85e64398bef540ea0b98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Behavioral Neuroscience

  1. R. Hen

In Developmental Neuroscience

  1. R. Hen
  2. V. Arango
  3. A. Dwork
  4. G. Rosoklija
  5. M. Boldrini
  6. Fred H. Gage

In Pharmacology

  1. R. Hen

Citations in the corpus