Demography versus habitat fragmentation as determinants of genetic variation in wild populations

By J. Gibbs. 2001

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effect of historic landscape change on the genetic structure of the bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli (2006, background): “The relationship between landscape pattern and population structure has become a major interest in landscape ecology (Fahrig and Merriam 1994; Ramirez and Haakonsen 1999; Gibbs 2001 ).”
Microevolutionary Response to Climatic Change (2004, background): “Habitat deterioration in combination with habitat loss, and the increase of fragmentation, will increase the effects of inbreeding and genetic drift by reducing population size and decreasing gene flow (e.g., Gibbs, 2001).”
The Mediterranean Sea as a ‘cul‐de‐sac’ for endemic fishes facing climate change (2010, background): “At the very least, habitat fragmentation can cause a loss of genetic diversity (Gibbs, 2001), and an increased population’s vulnerability to extreme events and disturbances (Piessens et al.”
Patterns of Genetic Diversity and Its Loss in Mammalian Populations (2005, background): “Demographic factors that may influence persistence of genetic diversity include population declines, bottlenecks, reduction of population range, and isolation from conspecifics (Gibbs 2001; Frankham et al. 2002; England et al. 2003).”