Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution
By F. Fukuyama. 2002
1,450 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e39d767f81387fe7800abc54bee601bf1c976dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Reproductive Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Critical Neuroscience: Linking Neuroscience and Society through Critical Practice (2009, background): “…Zeki, 2000, 2004) and hate (Zeki and Romaya, 2008) to empathy (Lamm et al., 2007) and experiences from psychoanalysis (Solms and Lechevalier, 2002) to shopping (Greenslit, 2002), while at the same time highlighting the ethical dangers and societal threats in doing so (Fukuyama, 2002; Illes, 2006).”
- Not so Fast. On Some Bold Neuroscientific Claims Concerning Human Agency (2010, background): “This profile could cause a reduction in the variety of personality styles and behaviors, which are key assets for economic, social and cultural development [77].”
- Cultural evolution, the postbiological universe and SETI (2003, background): “And Fukuyama (2002) argues strenuously against a possible ‘posthuman future’ that he sees stemming from advances in the brain sciences, neuropharmacology and behavior control, the prolongation of life and genetic engineering.”
- Dimensions of Naturalness (2008, neutral): “(Rolston 1979, 10; Matthews 1988, 122; Elliot 1994, 143; Oelschlaeger 1999, 223; Angermeier 2000, 374; Fukuyama 2002, 130; Verhoog et al. 2003, 41.)”
- Production Revolutions and Periodization of History: A Comparative and Theoretic-mathematical Approach (2007, background): “There is a great number of various suppositions concerning changes of that kind, they are dealt with by intellectuals in different fields starting from philosophers to fantasists (see e.g., Fukuyama 2002; Sterling 2005).”
- Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges (2009, neutral): “A pill that slightly improves memory or alertness is a very different thing than some future radical form of genetic engineering that could lead to the creation of a new ‘‘posthuman’’ human species (Silver 1998; Fukuyama 2002).”