Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions
By C. Souza. 2001
323 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper describes participatory budgeting in Brazil, where citizen assemblies in each district of a city determine priorities for the use of a part of the city’s revenues. This is one of the most significant innovations in Latin America for increasing citizen participation and local government accountability. After describing its antecedents, as various local governments sought to increase citizen involvement during the 1970s and 1980s, the paper reviews the experience with participatory budgeting in the cities of Porto Alegre and Belo Horizonte. It describes who took part in different (district and sectoral) citizen assemblies, the resources they could call on and the priorities established. It also discusses its effectiveness regarding increased participation, more pro-poor expenditures and greater local government accountability. While noting the limitations (for instance, some of the poorest groups were not involved, and in other cities it was not so successful) the paper also highlights how participatory budgeting allows formerly excluded groups to decide on investment priorities in their communities and to monitor government response. It has helped reduce clientelist practices and, perhaps more importantly for a society as unequal as Brazil, helped to build democratic institutions.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e2e1b994ae977cf4e3943c12ec93ed32f44c672
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Urban Studies
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil (2014, background): “This observation is in line with the usual evaluation of the Brazilian decentralization process, which highlights the success achieved in health/sanitation and education sectors as opposed to the limited progress made as regards municipal housing or social welfare programs (see Souza, 2001).”