ProteinNet: a standardized data set for machine learning of protein structure

By Mohammed Alquraishi. 2019

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Rapid progress in deep learning has spurred its application to bioinformatics problems including protein structure prediction and design. In classic machine learning problems like computer vision, progress has been driven by standardized data sets that facilitate fair assessment of new methods and lower the barrier to entry for non-domain experts. While data sets of protein sequence and structure exist, they lack certain components critical for machine learning, including high-quality multiple sequence alignments and insulated training/validation splits that account for deep but only weakly detectable homology across protein space. We created the ProteinNet series of data sets to provide a standardized mechanism for training and assessing data-driven models of protein sequence-structure relationships. ProteinNet integrates sequence, structure, and evolutionary information in programmatically accessible file formats tailored for machine learning frameworks. Multiple sequence alignments of all structurally characterized proteins were created using substantial high-performance computing resources. Standardized data splits were also generated to emulate the difficulty of past CASP (Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction) experiments by resetting protein sequence and structure space to the historical states that preceded six prior CASPs. Utilizing sensitive evolution-based distance metrics to segregate distantly related proteins, we have additionally created validation sets distinct from the official CASP sets that faithfully mimic their difficulty. ProteinNet represents a comprehensive and accessible resource for training and assessing machine-learned models of protein structure.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Evaluation & Benchmarks, Computational Biology & Bioinformatics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Jin Li
  2. Michael Heinzinger
  3. George M. Church
  4. Surojit Biswas
  5. Burkhard Rost
  6. Christian Dallago
  7. Konstantin Weissenow
  8. Ali Madani

In Molecular Biology

  1. Jin Li
  2. Michael Heinzinger
  3. Kevin Kaichuang Yang
  4. Christian Dallago
  5. Ahmed Elnaggar
  6. Ali Madani
  7. Yu Wang
  8. Burkhard Rost

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Jin Li
  2. Caiming Xiong
  3. Nazneen Rajani
  4. George M. Church
  5. Surojit Biswas
  6. Burkhard Rost
  7. Michael Heinzinger
  8. Konstantin Weissenow

In Computational Biology & Bioinformatics

  1. Michael Heinzinger
  2. Burkhard Rost
  3. Jin Li
  4. Kevin Kaichuang Yang
  5. Mohammed Alquraishi
  6. Christian Dallago
  7. Konstantin Weissenow
  8. Ahmed Elnaggar

Citations in the corpus