Risk perception: Another look at the 'white male' effect

By C. Palmer. 2003

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e1bf9262cf1ad0c0924d9f97d08e3814bbc6472

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Aaron M. McCright
2. R. Dunlap
3. Dan Kahan
4. Paul Slovic
5. J. Darley
6. P. Sol Hart
7. George Loewenstein
8. Daniel Västfjäll

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Dunlap
2. Aaron M. McCright
3. Dan Kahan
4. Paul Slovic
5. Donald Braman
6. John Gastil
7. Christopher Winship
8. J. Darley

Citations in the corpus

• Bringing ideology in: the conservative white male effect on worry about environmental problems in the USA (2013, methodology): “Specifically, we control for the effects of the following in our multivariate regression models: age (Finucane et al. 2000; Flynn, Slovic, and Mertz 1994; Kahan et al. 2007; Marshall 2004; Marshall et al. 2006; Palmer 2003; Satterfield, Mertz, and Slovic 2004); educational attainment (Finucane et al”
• Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States (2011, unknown): “, 2007; Palmer, 2003), be anti-egalitarian (e.g., Finucane et al., 2000; Flynn et al., 1994; Palmer, 2003; Satterfield et al., 2004), and favor hierarchy (e.”
• Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect in Risk Perception (2007, background): “However, one study has found that Taiwanese-American males, like white American males, rate health and technology risks to be low relative to white females, TaiwaneseAmerican females, and African Americans and Mexican Americans generally (Palmer 2003).”