Applicability of the PROSPECT model for Norway spruce needles

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

PROSPECT-PRO for estimating content of nitrogen-containing leaf proteins and other carbon-based constituents (2020, background): “, 2008, 2017) or to adapt to specific conditions and leaf types, for example needle-shaped leaves (Malenovský et al., 2006).”
Estimation of dry matter content in leaves using normalized indexes and PROSPECT model inversion (2012, methodology): “On the other hand, Malenovský et al. (2006) obtained higher RMSE (0.0079 g cm−2) with a single species, Picea abies, but only using the spectral range 450–1000 nm, which is not as sensitive as the SWIR to DM. Inversion with PROSPECT using all input parameters for fresh samples gave r2 = 0.369,…”
Inversion of a coupled canopy–atmosphere model using multi-angular top-of-atmosphere radiance data: A forest case study (2011, methodology): “This might be avoided by recalibrating PROSPECT (Malenovský et al., 2006), or by using the mbinations.”
PROSPECT-D: towards modeling leaf optical properties through a complete lifecycle (2017, unknown): “…is no unique method, and adaptations have been proposed to in : Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 193, n° may 2017, p.204-215 calibrate PROSPECT: Malenovský et al. (2006) adjusted SACs for needle-shaped leaves; Féret et al. (2008) have simultaneously determined the refractive index and SAC of…”