Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis A Reply to Amedeo Giorgi

By Jonathan A. Smith. Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 2010

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

From a concern with the scientific standing of phenomenology, Giorgi (2010) criticizes two forms of phenomenological practice: interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) and the approach of Collaizzi, along with three doctoral dissertations. In this paper I will respond to the critique of IPA presented by Giorgi.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1df1bf319a3b238f55bdfae485982d5ce5b0ab15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Anthony Vincent Fernandez
2. A. Køster

Citations in the corpus

• Investigating modes of being in the world: an introduction to Phenomenologically grounded qualitative research (2021, background): “Smith (2010, 2018) defended the philosophical foundations of his approach, arguing that it draws extensively from the 1 Some of the better-known approaches have been developed by Peter Ashworth (2003); Paul Colaizzi (1978); Karin Dahlberg et al. (2008); Amedeo Giorgi (2009); Darren Langdridge…”