Symmetric Atlasing and Model Based Segmentation: An Application to the Hippocampus in Older Adults
By G. Grabner, Andrew L. Janke, Marc M. Budge, David Smith, Jens C. Pruessner, D. Louis Collins. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2006
607 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Neurology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1dddfba077f5396ffc3d1da44f7426109fd55d99
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Alan C. Evans
- Jason P. Lerch
- Sylvain Baillet
- D. Louis Collins
- Andrew L. Janke
- Klaus Hermann Maier-Hein
- M. Mallar Chakravarty
- Armin Raznahan
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Daniel Rueckert
- Ben Glocker
- Konstantinos Kamnitsas
- Marc Niethammer
- D. Louis Collins
- Klaus Hermann Maier-Hein
- Roland Kwitt
- Xiao Yang
In Neurology
Citations in the corpus
- Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibration (2020, methodology): “For preprocessing, all images are first affinely registered to the ICBM MNI152 nonlinear atlas [15] using NiftyReg [40, 41, 50] and intensity normalized via histogram equalization.”
- Efficient multi‐scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation (2016, methodology): “All images were resampled to an isotropic 1 mm 3 resolution, with dimensions 193 × 229 × 193 and affinely registered (Studholme et al. (1999)) to MNI space using the atlas by Grabner et al. (2006).”
- Trajectories of cortical thickness maturation in normal brain development – The importance of quality control procedures (2015, positive): “) Register both cortical surfaces for each hemisphere non-linearly to a high resolution average surface template generated from the ICBM152 data set in order to establish inter-subject correspondence of the cortical points (Mazziotta et al., 1995; Lyttelton et al., 2007; Grabner et al., 2006).”
- Performing Label-Fusion-Based Segmentation Using Multiple Automatically Generated Templates (2012, methodology): “Most of these evaluations estimate how well nonlinear registration algorithms are able to recover anatomical differences between subjects and between a subject and a neuroanatomical template [Grabner et al., 2006; Holmes et al., 1998; Mazziotta et al., 2001a], but do little in the way of accounting ”
- Quicksilver: Fast Predictive Image Registration – a Deep Learning Approach (2017, methodology): “All images used in our experiments are first affinely registered to the ICBM MNI152 nonlinear atlas [65] This regularizer is too weak to assure a diffeomorphic transformation based on the sufficient regularity conditions discussed in [13].”
- Deep MRI brain extraction: A 3D convolutional neural network for skull stripping (2016, methodology): “, 2002)was utilized to register the reference mask on the 1 mm MNI152 T1w average brain mask (Grabner et al., 2006).”
- Unbiased Average Age-Appropriate Atlases for Pediatric Studies (2010, neutral): “…2001; Thompson and Toga, 2002; Essen and David, 2002; Thompson and Toga, 2002; Toga and Thompson, 2007; Essen and David, 2005; Seghers et al., 2004; Grabner et al., 2006); and (3) to function as a reference for a particular population group in order to study intra-and inter-group variability or…”
- Brain templates and atlases (2012, background): “, a symmetric template to study hemispheric differences (Grabner et al., 2006), a single-gender template to study gender differences etc.”
- Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization (2012, neutral): “The majority of these templates are derived from healthy young adults, though specialized templates have been created for pediatric studies (Wilke et al., 2008) and healthy aging (Lemaître et al., 2005; Grabner et al., 2006).”