Inferring species interactions in ecological communities: a comparison of methods at different levels of complexity

By F. Carrara, A. Giometto, M. Seymour, Andrea Rinaldo, F. Altermatt. 2015

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1db2acf1e73fcc3a8a1a3041774174fb09a437c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. E. Mächler
2. N. Schtickzelle
3. Owen L. Petchey
4. F. Altermatt
5. Sandrine Pavoine
6. Jari Oksanen
7. David Mouillot
8. Sébastien Villéger

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. A. Giometto
2. N. Schtickzelle
3. Delphine Legrand
4. E. A. Fronhofer
5. Owen L. Petchey
6. F. Altermatt
7. Sandrine Pavoine
8. David Mouillot

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. E. Mächler
2. A. Giometto
3. N. Schtickzelle
4. Delphine Legrand
5. Owen L. Petchey
6. F. Altermatt
7. Sandrine Pavoine
8. M. Baguette

Citations in the corpus

• Big answers from small worlds: a user's guide for protist microcosms as a model system in ecology and evolution (2015, methodology): “Measurements of interaction strengths are usually done by measuring population growth in single-species versus pairwise two-species settings (for a comparison of methods and data requirement, see Novak & Wootton 2010; Carrara et al. 2014).”