What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice

By S. Speer. 2002

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

‘You Couldn't Say “No”, Could You?’: Young Men's Understandings of Sexual Refusal (2006, background): “First, feminist research is generally guided by the principle that the impact of the researcher on the researched should be reduced as much as possible (Speer, 2002).”
`Natural' and `contrived' data: a sustainable distinction? (2002, background): “Likewise, if one wants to analyse interview talk where participants are asked to comment on gender issues in order to discover how people do gender as a matter of course, then such prompted ‘gender commentary’ may seem contrived, and thus not the best data for our present purposes (Speer, 2002).”
Qualitative methods overview (2011, unknown): “Disadvantages of conversation analysis Conversation analysis has proved to be controversial in terms of its wider philosophical and methodological underpinnings (Speer 2002; Hammersley 2003b, 2003a; Speer and Hutchby 2003b).”