Seismic strengthening of masonry-infilled RC frames with TRM: Experimental study

By L. Koutas, S. Bousias, T. Triantafillou. 2015

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Bond between TRM versus FRP composites and concrete at high temperatures (2017, background): “[15e20]); and the seismic retrofitting of infilled RC frames [21].”
TRM vs FRP jacketing in shear strengthening of concrete members subjected to high temperatures (2016, background): “TRM has been also investigated as a strengthening system of RC elements [10e17] or structures [18] and has been found to be a very promising solution.”
TRM versus FRP in flexural strengthening of RC beams: Behaviour at high temperatures (2017, unknown): “16–20]; the seismic retrofitting of RC columns [21-26]; and the seismic reinforcing of infilled RC frames [27].”
Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams (2017, background): “[20– 24]), reinforcing of infilled RC frames subjected to seismic load [25], flexural strengthening of one-way (e.”
Bond between textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) and concrete substrates: Experimental investigation (2016, background): “[2,12e16]), seismic retrofitting of infilled RC frames [17].”