Chronic Treatment with the γ-Secretase Inhibitor LY-411,575 Inhibits β-Amyloid Peptide Production and Alters Lymphopoiesis and Intestinal Cell Differentiation*

By G. Wong, D. Manfra, F. Poulet, Qi Zhang, H. Josien, T. Bara, L. Engstrom, Maria C. Pinzon-Ortiz, J. Fine, Hu-Jung J. Lee and 3 more. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2004

651 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Inhibition of γ-secretase, one of the enzymes responsible for the cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) to produce the pathogenic β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides, is an attractive approach to the treatment of Alzheimer disease. In addition to APP, however, several other γ-secretase substrates have been identified (e.g. Notch), and altered processing of these substrates by γ-secretase inhibitors could lead to unintended biological consequences. To study the in vivo consequences of γ-secretase inhibition, the γ-secretase inhibitor LY-411,575 was administered to C57BL/6 and TgCRND8 APP transgenic mice for 15 days. Although most tissues were unaffected, doses of LY-411,575 that inhibited Aβ production had marked effects on lymphocyte development and on the intestine. LY-411,575 decreased overall thymic cellularity and impaired intrathymic differentiation at the CD4-CD8-CD44+CD25+ precursor stage. No effects on peripheral T cell populations were noted following LY-411,575 treatment, but evidence for the altered maturation of peripheral B cells was observed. In the intestine, LY-411,575 treatment increased goblet cell number and drastically altered tissue morphology. These effects of LY-411,575 were not seen in mice that were administered LY-D, a diastereoisomer of LY-411,575, which is a very weak γ-secretase inhibitor. These studies show that inhibition of γ-secretase has the expected benefit of reducing Aβ in a murine model of Alzheimer disease but has potentially undesirable biological effects as well, most likely because of the inhibition of Notch processing.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d7f4dbf4c077bb443ec91488c110fe265f95cb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pharmacology

  1. Martin Citron
  2. Sokratis G. Papageorgiou
  3. K. Yiannopoulou

In Physiology

  1. Martin Citron
  2. Sokratis G. Papageorgiou
  3. K. Yiannopoulou

Citations in the corpus