An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
By Anthony J. Bell, Terrence J. Sejnowski. 1995
Subfields: Natural Language Processing, Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Yoshua Bengio
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Mohit Bansal
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Jianfeng Gao
- Quoc V. Le
- Richard Socher
- Graham Neubig
In Optimization & Training
- Yoshua Bengio
- Francis R. Bach
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Sergey Levine
- Quoc V. Le
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Roger Baker Grosse
- Michael I. Jordan
Citations in the corpus
- Fast large-scale optimization by unifying stochastic gradient and quasi-Newton methods (2013, methodology): “We trained an Independent Components Analysis (ICA) (Bell & Sejnowski, 1995) We trained an Ising/Hopfield model on MNIST digits, us-ing code from (Hillar et al., 2012).”
- Flow++: Improving Flow-Based Generative Models with Variational Dequantization and Architecture Design (2019, methodology): “A flow model f is constructed as an invertible transformation that maps observed data x to a standard Gaussian latent variable z = f ( x ) , as in nonlinear independent component analysis (Bell & Sejnowski, 1995; Hyv¨arinen et al., 2004; Hyv¨arinen & Pajunen, 1999).”
- Density estimation using Real NVP (2016, background): “However, naive application of the change of variable formula produces models which are computationally expensive and poorly conditioned, and so large scale models of this type have not entered general use.”
- On Mutual Information Maximization for Representation Learning (2019, background): “One solution is to maximize the entropy of the representation instead (Bell and Sejnowski, 1995).”
- Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximization (2018, methodology): “Some of the older methods, such as independent component analysis (ICA, Bell & Sejnowski, 1995) and self-organizing maps (Kohonen, 1998) generally cannot represent complex relationships in data.”
- Learning Robust and Multilingual Speech Representations (2020, neutral): “learn representations that describe data by maximizing mutual information between data and representation variables, have been explored for a long time in unsupervised representation learning (Linsker, 1988; Bell and Sejnowski, 1995).”
- Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1? (1997, methodology): “Among these are the algorithms of Comon (1994), Amari, Cichocki, & Yang (1996), and Bell & Sejnowski (1995).”
- Deep learning in neural networks: An overview (2014, background): “Many do this to uncover and disentangle hidden underlying sources of signals (e.g., Andrade, Chacon, Merelo, & Moran, 1993; Bell & Sejnowski, 1995; Belouchrani, Abed-Meraim, Cardoso, & Moulines, 1997; Cardoso, 1994; Comon, 1994; Hyvärinen, Karhunen, & Oja, 2001; Jutten & Herault, 1991; Karhunen &…”
- Information Dropout: Learning Optimal Representations Through Noisy Computation (2016, background): “In this section, we outline strong connections between Information Dropout, Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) [5], and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) [22], [23].”
- On Variational Bounds of Mutual Information (2019, background): “…x ∼ p ( x ) , the goal is to learn a stochastic representation of the data p θ ( y | x ) that has maximal MI with X subject to constraints on the mapping (e.g. Bell & Sejnowski, 1995; Krause et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2017; van den Oord et al., 2018; Hjelm et al., 2018; Alemi et al., 2017).”
- High-Dimensional Probability Estimation with Deep Density Models (2013, methodology): “lt to flexibly parameterize the space of such invertible maps, however, let alone find a transformation that results in a tractable density on the representation space. Independent components analysis [Bell and Sejnowski, 1995] and the related idea of a density network [MacKay and Gibbs, 1997] are exa”
- Formal Limitations on the Measurement of Mutual Information (2018, methodology): “Another related framework is INFOMAX (Linsker, 1988; Bell & Sejnowski, 1995; Hjelm et al., 2018).”
- A Survey of Inductive Biases for Factorial Representation-Learning (2016, background): “Maximization of non-Gaussianity has a connection to information theory as well: it is equivalent to maximizing the mutual information between the observed data and the learned representation [9, 21], and forms the basis of a group of models called Independent Components Analysis or ICA .”
- Maximum Entropy Generators for Energy-Based Models (2019, background): “With x = G ( z ) the function of interest and x discrete-valued: This idea of maximizing mutual information between inputs and outputs of an encoder to maximize the entropy of its output dates back at least to Linsker (1988); Bell & Sejnowski (1995) and their work on Infomax.”
- A Unifying Information-Theoretic Framework for Independent Component Analysis (2000, methodology): “Intuitive explanations have been proposed by Bell and Sejnowski (1995), Lambert and Bell (1997), Girolami and Fyfe (1997c) and Lee, Bell and Orglmeister (1997).”
- Motor patterns in human walking and running. (2006, methodology): “As before, we ordered the ICA and NMF components so that their waveforms matched the corresponding FA components (Fig.”
- Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review (2008, methodology): “Techniques for Independent Component Analysis [11] are not included in our review, because they were mainly designed for blind-source separation.”