The Conservationist Mode of Production and Conservation NGOs in sub‐Saharan Africa
By Dan Brockington, K. Scholfield. 2010
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Building and Construction, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d7c4745a87fb76c5e9cf3b25b417ad3fbc51792
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anthropology
In Building and Construction
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Accumulation by Conservation (2014, background): “But see Brockington and Scholfield (2010) and Holmes (2010) for cautionary notes about the power and dominance of these BINGOs.”
- Lively commodities and encounter value (2016, background): “…opportunity for understanding encounter value’s integral role in configuring ‘conservationist modes of production’, a term deployed by geographers to refer to capital’s appropriation of wildlife by forging conditions for its transformation into commodities (Brockington and Scholfield, 2010).”
- Pastoralist livelihoods and wildlife revenues in East Africa: a case for coexistence? (2012, background): “…is booming in East Africa; wildlife-based tourism remains a big earner for some, and analysis of the great majority of conservation NGOs in sub-Saharan Africa confirms their promotion of wildlife-based tourism as a money earner or source of significant investment (Brockington and Scholfield 2010).”