CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma.

By T. Coroller, Patrick Grossmann, Ying Hou, E. Rios Velazquez, R. Leijenaar, Gretchen Hermann, Philippe Lambin, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, R. Mak, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2015

668 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiomics provides opportunities to quantify the tumor phenotype non-invasively by applying a large number of quantitative imaging features. This study evaluates computed-tomography (CT) radiomic features for their capability to predict distant metastasis (DM) for lung adenocarcinoma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included two datasets: 98 patients for discovery and 84 for validation. The phenotype of the primary tumor was quantified on pre-treatment CT-scans using 635 radiomic features. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate radiomics performance using the concordance index (CI). RESULTS Thirty-five radiomic features were found to be prognostic (CI>0.60, FDR<5%) for DM and twelve for survival. It is noteworthy that tumor volume was only moderately prognostic for DM (CI=0.55, p-value=2.77×10(-5)) in the discovery cohort. A radiomic-signature had strong power for predicting DM in the independent validation dataset (CI=0.61, p-value=1.79×10(-17)). Adding this radiomic-signature to a clinical model resulted in a significant improvement of predicting DM in the validation dataset (p-value=1.56×10(-11)). CONCLUSIONS Although only basic metrics are routinely quantified, this study shows that radiomic features capturing detailed information of the tumor phenotype can be used as a prognostic biomarker for clinically-relevant factors such as DM. Moreover, the radiomic-signature provided additional information to clinical data.

Subfields: Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d72f25545d93332b7e2f5d7211655e63d864796

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Oncology

  1. Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
  2. Philippe Lambin
  3. Ahmed Hosny
  4. Charles Swanton

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

  1. Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
  2. Chintan Parmar
  3. Ahmed Hosny
  4. Philippe Lambin
  5. John Quackenbush
  6. R. Larue
  7. Charles Swanton
  8. Nikos Paragios

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
  2. Philippe Lambin
  3. Chintan Parmar
  4. Ahmed Hosny
  5. John Quackenbush
  6. R. Larue
  7. D. de Ruysscher
  8. W. van Elmpt

Citations in the corpus