Shape memory alloys, Part II: Modeling of polycrystals

364 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A robust model of pseudoelasticity in shape memory alloys (2013, neutral): “The corresponding literature is very rich; a systematic review is not attempted here; see [3, 4] for an overview.”
A review of constitutive models and modeling techniques for shape memory alloys (2016, methodology): “In Patoor et al. (2006), the authors reviewed the kinematics of the martensitic transformation with a discussion of micromechanical modeling for single crystal SMAs while Lagoudas et al. (2006) focused on micromechanical and phenomenological models of polycrystalline SMAs.”
Three-dimensional modeling and numerical analysis of rate-dependent irrecoverable deformation in shape memory alloys (2010, methodology): “…that has not been addressed in the SMA modeling community to date: a new class of irrecoverable deformations that are described by the rate-dependent, diffusion-driven viscoplastic strains induced by the processes of climb and other motion of vacancies or dislocations (Lemaitre and Chaboche, 1990).”
Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: A review (2012, background): “0% Ti) and a low symmetry product phase (martensite in the form of monoclinic distortion of a B19 lattice) [2].”