Reliability and validity in research.

By P. Roberts, H. Priest. Nursing Standard, 2006

787 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d70bcf63b7a69430d02c91666e63f843924e8d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. K. Lamb
2. Edward Stanley
3. Grace Smith
4. Edward Thomson

In Information Systems

1. K. Lamb
2. Edward Stanley
3. Grace Smith
4. Edward Thomson

In Social Psychology

1. K. Lamb
2. Edward Stanley
3. Grace Smith
4. Edward Thomson

Citations in the corpus

• An analysis of the three-dimensional kinetics and kinematics of maximal effort punches among amateur boxers (2018, methodology): “For each punch type, 10 trials were randomly selected for analysis with the time between force plate contact (recorded objectively by the Kistler platforms) and punch initiation (determined by the lead researcher) recorded in Visual 3D. Analysis revealed INITIATION identification was consistent acro”
• Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. (2017, background): “A validade refere-se ao fato de um instrumento medir exatamente o que se propõe a medir.(36,37) Ressalta-se que a validade não é uma característica do instrumento e deve ser determinada com relação a uma questão particular, uma vez que se refere a uma população definida.”