Common test conditions and software reference configurations
By Frank Bossen. 2010
2,543 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d5157f99ee53e2786c0d676d0e5d50fc58dbee9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- A Highly Parallel Framework for HEVC Coding Unit Partitioning Tree Decision on Many-core Processors (2014, background): “The default encoding test conditions are specified in [19].”
- Decoder-side HEVC quality enhancement with scalable convolutional neural network (2017, methodology): “We test our approach on 9 sequences from JCT-VC database [21], non-overlapping with the training and validation sets.”
- Enhancing Quality for HEVC Compressed Videos (2017, methodology): “In our experiments, we test our method and the other two methods on 17 sequences from the JCT-VC [36] database.”
- Efficient Parallel Framework for HEVC Motion Estimation on Many-Core Processors (2014, methodology): “The default encoding test conditions are specified in [37] using different quantization parameters (QPs) (22, 27, 32, and 37).”
- Fast CU size decision and mode decision algorithm for HEVC intra coding (2013, methodology): “The proposed algorithm is evaluated with QPs 22, 27, 32 and 37 using sequences recommended by JCT-VC in four resolutions [14] (416×240/832×480/1920×1080/2560×1600 formats).”
- HEVC Complexity and Implementation Analysis (2012, methodology): “The JCT-VC common test conditions [12] define a set of encoder configurations used in experiments.”
- Deep Contextual Video Compression (2021, methodology): “Testing data The testing data includes HEVC Class B (1080P), C (480P), D (240P), E (720P) from the common test conditions [34] used by codec standard community.”
- Sample Adaptive Offset in the HEVC Standard (2012, methodology): “In the HEVC reference software common test conditions [28], hierarchical quantization parameter (QP) settings for each group of pictures (GOP) are often used.”
- CNN-Based Bi-Directional Motion Compensation for High Efficiency Video Coding (2018, background): “The common test conditions [20] are adopted in our experiment.”
- HEVC: The New Gold Standard for Video Compression: How Does HEVC Compare with H.264/AVC? (2012, methodology): “For testing HEVC, the random access high efficiency (RA-HE) configuration was used [19], to ensure achieving the highest compression performance.”
- UVG dataset: 50/120fps 4K sequences for video codec analysis and development (2020, methodology): “In all these cases, the relevance of our UVG dataset is validated against the 2160p sequences of the VVC CTC dataset [19], which can be considered the most pertinent reference in current video coding research.”
- Comparative Rate-Distortion-Complexity Analysis of HEVC and AVC Video Codecs (2012, methodology): “Two 10-bit sequences included in [11] have been excluded from our test set, since they are beyond the capabilities of JM HiP.”