Planetary Economics: Energy, climate change and the three domains of sustainable development
By Michael Grubb. 2014
221 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d41911ffc747fd7607f0e8e3239b0bf398662ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: why transparency is not enough (2019, methodology): “The Hall et al. (2017) study critically analysed the development of renewable energy investment in the UK by employing the framework of the “three domains” of socioeconomic processes developed by Grubb et al. (2014).”
- Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation (2018, background): “Based on the foregoing considerations, we may need to altogether rethink the appropriate role of carbon pricing in a dynamic process of decarbonisation: instead of spearheading innovation and systemic transformation, it may be most useful where it can incentivise marginal optimisation in specific co”
- Economic growth and development with low‐carbon energy (2017, background): “Supporting clean-tech innovation requires a combination of environmental policies (addressing environmental externalities) and R&D policies (addressing innovation-related market failures) along the full “innovation chain” from research to development, demonstration and deployment (Grubb 2014; Popp 2”
- Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions (2019, unknown): “It is becoming a commonly accepted truism that we must minimize vulnerability to the interrelated socio-economic and environmental risks associated with continued fossil fuel consumption (Grubb 2014).”
- The critical role of the industrial sector in reaching long-term emission reduction, energy efficiency and renewable targets (2016, background): “2 At the global level, the industrial sector is responsible for over a third of energy demand and a slightly 41 higher emissions share ([5] & [6]).”
- Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? (2020, background): “Decisive state interventions are also required to stabilise the climate, by tipping energy and industrial systems towards newer, cleaner, and ultimately cheaper modes of production that become impossible to outcompete (Acemoglu et al., 2012; Grubb, 2014; Aghion et al., 2016; Farmer et al., 2019).”
- UK Electricity Market Reform and the Energy Transition:Emerging Lessons (2018, background): “Mazzucato (2013) refers to the role of ‘market creation and shaping’ as part of ‘Mission-oriented innovation’, whilst Grubb (2014) argues that such strategic considerations form a distinct domain of economic processes linked to evolutionary and system innovation theories, implying a role for…”
- Investing in low-carbon transitions: energy finance as an adaptive market (2017, background): “E-mail: s.hall@leeds.ac.uk http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1094731 # 2015 The Author(s).”
- Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework (2018, background): “ecological economics that are missing from most socio-technical approaches [8,9].”
- Carbon Pricing: Effectiveness and Equity (2018, unknown): “For discussion, see Grubb et al. (2014).”
- Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches (2015, background): “…problems are common to many new technologies, the ‘ market pull ’ for energy ef fi cient technologies is weak unless they simultaneously offer other user bene fi ts — not least because public good bene fi ts such as climate protection and energy security are not captured by individual adopters [67].”
- Equity, climate justice and fossil fuel extraction: principles for a managed phase out (2020, unknown): “…sense then to maximise efforts to mitigate the larger, more unpredictable, less familiar, and potentially catastrophic impacts of climate change, while investing heavily in equitably addressing the more predictable, manageable costs of transition (Weitzman, 2011; Grubb 2014; Kartha and Baer 2015).”