The Myth of the Paperless Office

By C. Reid. J. Documentation, 2003

779 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d3779bba1e8d4b58c85e75d44a007e37527cfae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Use of Travel Time by Rail Passengers in Great Britain (2007, result): “This corresponds with a number of other studies that have found that paper is still the most important resource for mobile working due to its low space requirements and suitability for shared working (O’Hara et. al., 2002; Brown and O’Hara, 2003; and Sellen and Harper, 2001).”
Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years (2005, background): “major driving forces for the increasing consumption of paper (Hart and Liu, 2003; Liu and Stork, 2000; Sellen and Harper, 2002).”
Keepin' it real: pushing the desktop metaphor with physics, piles and the pen (2006, background): “Sellen et al. [34] identified that the beneficial physical properties of paper include being thin, light, porous, opaque and flexible.”
Tourism and Mobile Technology (2003, background): “In this way, the format of the paper guide allowed both staff and visitor to interact around the guide (see also (Sellen and Harper, 2001)).”
Knowledge Worker Roles and Actions— Results of Two Empirical Studies (2011, background): “(Davenport, 1999) (Davis, 2003) (Sellen and Harper, 2003) (Efimova, 2004) (Holsapple and Jones, 2004, 2005) (Hädrich, 2008) (Bernstein, 2010)”
Feature congestion: a measure of display clutter (2005, background): “As another example of the dependence upon user expertise, Sellen and Harper [ 24] cite the example of a manager whose desk his employers found so unacceptably cluttered that they insisted he put all his papers in boxes whenever the company had visitors.”