The spoofax language workbench: rules for declarative specification of languages and IDEs

By Lennart C. L. Kats, Eelco Visser. Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, 2010

494 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d17b9b3c4067b4660e923a2041af0955b7af18d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Jonathan Aldrich
2. Claire Le Goues
3. Alberto Manuel Rodrigues da Silva

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. Claire Le Goues
2. Alberto Manuel Rodrigues da Silva

In Information Systems and Management

1. Michael C Hilton
2. Alberto Manuel Rodrigues da Silva

Citations in the corpus

• Toward Semantic Foundations for Program Editors (2017, background): “Sophisticated editors like Eclipse, and editor generators like Spoofax [21], use error recovery heuristics that silently insert tokens so that the editor-internal representation is well-formed [1, 8, 16, 20].”
• Model-driven engineering: A survey supported by the unified conceptual model (2015, methodology): “EMF, Microsoft Software Factories, and JetBrains MPS, but many others could be considered as well, namely: MetaEditþ [79], SDF/Stratego/Spoofax [30], xText [5], Obeo Designer/Sirius [82] or some academic proposals such as MIC (Model Integrated Computing) [78] with the tool GME (Generic Modeling Envi”