Cryogenic Machining-Induced Surface Integrity: A Review and Comparison with Dry, MQL, and Flood-Cooled Machining

By Y. Kaynak, Tao Lu, I. S. Jawahir. 2014

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d086422e642f7eaa35ad001b4e3af0e4dd32f8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. I. S. Jawahir
2. Stephen T. Newman
3. Kapil Kumar Gupta
4. Alborz Shokrani
5. Y. Kaynak
6. R. Laubscher

In Materials Chemistry

1. Y. Kaynak
2. I. S. Jawahir
3. Kapil Kumar Gupta
4. R. Laubscher
5. Stephen T. Newman
6. Tian Xia
7. C. Arvin
8. Alborz Shokrani

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Y. Kaynak
2. Stephen T. Newman
3. I. S. Jawahir
4. Kapil Kumar Gupta
5. R. Laubscher
6. Alborz Shokrani
7. Tian Xia
8. C. Arvin

Citations in the corpus

• Cryogenic cooling-induced process performance and surface integrity in drilling CFRP composite material (2016, methodology): “[19].”
• Hybrid cryogenic MQL for improving tool life in machining of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy (2019, result): “This is in contrast to the findings in literature [23, 26, 60-62] where improved surface integrity and surface roughness has been reported as a result of using cryogenic cooling when compared to flood cooling.”
• Sustainable machining of titanium alloys: A critical review (2017, background): “An important review article reported by Yildiz and Nalbant51 and Kaynak et al.52 on cryogenic cooling–based machining also covers some of the aspects of machining titanium alloys; nevertheless, a detailed review of significant investigations on cryogenic cooling–based machining of titanium alloys in”