The sensitivity of Emiliania huxleyi (Prymnesiophyceae) to ultraviolet‐b radiation

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ocean acidification exacerbates the effect of UV radiation on the calcifying phytoplankter Emiliania huxleyi (2009, methodology): “Quintero-Torres et al. (2006) assessed by modeling that coccolith structures can backscatter as much as 50% UVR.”
Sensitivity of Laminariales zoospores from Helgoland (North Sea) to ultraviolet and photosynthetically active radiation: implications for depth distribution and seasonal reproduction (2005, background): “These photoproducts inhibit transcription and replication of DNA and consequently disrupt cell metabolism and division (Buma et al. 1995, 2000), directly constraining cell viability and growth.”
Pigments and photoacclimation processes (2011, background): “…and Roy, 2001), dinoflagellates (with clear intra-specific, strain-related differences: Laurion and Roy, 2009), haptophytes (Döhler and Haas, 1995; Buma et al., 2000), eustigmatophytes (Sobrino et al., 2005), natural phytoplankton (Döhler and Hagmeier, 1997), and green macroalgae (Choo et al.,…”
PAR and UVBR effects on photosynthesis, viability, growth and DNA in different life stages of two coexisting Gigartinales: implications for recruitment and zonation pattern (2004, methodology): “The biologically effective doses (BED) applied in each treatment were calculated using 2 action spectra for well-known biological responses: DNA damage for Escherichia coli (280 to 320 nm, Setlow 1974) and the generalized plant damage (280 to 312 nm) described by Caldwell (1971).”