A comparison of embedded sensor Lamb wave ultrasonic tomography approaches for material loss detection

By T. Hay, R. Royer, Huidong Gao, Xiang Zhao, Joseph L. Rose. 2006

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Piezoelectric Transducer-Based Structural Health Monitoring for Aircraft Applications (2019, methodology): “A new damage index adjusting Lamb wave damage detection was developed based on the features of real and imaginary parts of the EMI signals.”
Feature Extraction and Sensor Fusion for Ultrasonic Structural Health Monitoring Under Changing Environmental Conditions (2009, methodology): “The overall match in waveform shape can also be quantified by the correlation coefficient, which has been used as a basic differential feature for damage detection [21].”
Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography in structural health monitoring (2011, background): “Hay et al [17] compared the advantages and limitations of this earlier work primarily undertaken with contact and noncontact transducers, immersion transducers and laser ultrasound.”
Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Defect detection, localization and growth monitoring (2007, methodology): “conventional filtered back-projection computer tomography in another study [23].”