Reflecting on the Use of IPA with Focus Groups: Pitfalls and Potentials

By L. Tomkins, Virginia Eatough. 2010

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cdeb87b9d6e486dd6c220a99da8116a57c7bfb4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. B. Love
2. A. Vetere
3. P. Davis

In Sociology and Political Science

1. B. Love
2. A. Vetere
3. P. Davis

Citations in the corpus

• Should Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) be Used With Focus Groups? Navigating the Bumpy Road of “Iterative Loops,” Idiographic Journeys, and “Phenomenological Bridges” (2020, methodology): “Such criticisms have centered on the difficulty of extrapolating the idiographic accounts, which are more embedded within the shared experience of a focus group setting (Palmer et al., 2010) and that the collective group voice dominates the individual’s account (Tomkins & Eatough, 2010).”