IS MICROCREDIT A BLESSING FOR THE POOR? A META-ANALYSIS

By Myrto Chliova, J. Brinckmann, Nina Rosenbusch. 2015

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cdde03bd98740f91c66ce25e7cf38b75e1d123c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. M. Meyskens
2. M. F. Bhuiyan
3. Maija Renko
4. A. Ivlevs
5. Todd W. Moss

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Meyskens
2. M. F. Bhuiyan
3. Maija Renko
4. Emily S. Block
5. A. Ivlevs
6. Todd W. Moss
7. Helena Alves

In Management Information Systems

1. M. Meyskens
2. Maija Renko
3. Emily S. Block
4. Todd W. Moss

Citations in the corpus

• Micro-entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Bangladesh (2019, background): “Notwithstanding the substantial body of evidence on the effects of microcredit on socio-economic outcomes (see e.g., Duvendack et al. (2011), Chliova et al. (2015) and Gopalaswamy et al. (2016) for reviews of this literature), little remains known on how microcredit affects subjective well-being.”
• Funding the story of hybrid ventures: Crowdfunder lending preferences and linguistic hybridity (2017, background): “12 that do not have access to traditional financing to start or expand their business and improve their financial well-being (Chliova et al., 2015; Khavul 2010, Yunus 1998).”