The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda‐Setting Theory Meets Big Data

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary (2015, methodology): “Social media can be used as a tool by politicians and the public to communicate an agenda that, in turn, shapes the media agenda (Metzgar & Maruggi, 2008; Neuman et al., 2014; Sayre et al., 2010).”
Comparing Disaster News on Twitter and Television: an Intermedia Agenda Setting Perspective (2017, background): “However, as Neuman et al. (2014) stated, the inter-media agenda setting process is dynamic.”
Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter (2018, background): “This points toward persistent — although probably diffuse and mediated — agenda-setting effects between mass media and social media (Neuman, Guggenheim, Jang, & Bae, 2014) as well as within social media.”
The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016 (2018, methodology): “This analysis of intermedia agenda setting relied on Vargo and Guo’s (2017) theme categorization and sorted the data by themes that have been thought to broadly encompass major issues in US news coverage (Neuman et al., 2014).”