Effects of landscape connectivity on the spatial distribution of insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes
By T. Diekötter, Regula Billeter, T. O. Crist. 2008
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cc9898dc8249da38821e4d6415bee1c2c0d0ba0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Mitigating the effects of insecticides on arthropod biological control at field and landscape scales (2014, background): “IPM programs are typically deployed at the field or farm level, yet there is considerable linkage among adjacent farms and other land use types in terms of the exchange of pest and beneficial insects (Ekbom et al., 2000; Rand et al., 2006; Diekötter et al., 2008; Chisholm et al. 2014).”
- Landscape heterogeneity as an ecological filter of species traits (2014, unknown): “Such measure of 101 landscape-level gamma diversity hierarchically depends on local diversity (alpha) and bet 102 diversity among patches of the same habitat types (beta patch) and among habitat types (beta 103 habitat (Crist et al. 2003, Diekotter et al., 2008).”
- Sown wildflower strips for insect conservation: a review (2011, background): “…(Kotze & O’Hara, 2003), bugs (Frank&Künzle, 2006) and bees (Biesmeijer et al., 2006;Kohler et al., 2007), and the general homogenisation of the agricultural landscape is seen as one important factor driving these trends (Benton et al., 2003; Tscharntke et al., 2005; Diekotter et al., 2008).”