Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk
By Phhilippe Jorion. 2000
3,353 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cc90c5283679dc71d58f20175b55eea857924c8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Nieto
- Esther Ruiz
- Paul Embrechts
- Michael Mcaleer
- Andrew J. Patton
- Kris Boudt
- James W. Taylor
- Walid Mensi
Citations in the corpus
- Robustness of the Ljung-Box Test and its Rank Equivalent (2002, unknown): “See Jorion (2000) for background and references.”
- Using extreme value theory to measure value-at-risk for daily electricity spot prices (2006, background): “Longin (1996) examines extreme movements in U.S. stock prices and shows that the extreme returns obey a Fréchet fattailed distribution. Ho, Burridge, Cadle, and Theobald (2000) and Gençay and Selçuk (2004) apply EVT to emerging stock markets which have been affected by a recent financial crisis.”
- Dynamic Copula Modelling for Value at Risk (2006, unknown): “Therefore is suffices to discuss methods of VaR calculations using a long position (for more details see Jorion (2000), Tsay (2002)).”
- VaR and expected shortfall in portfolios of dependent credit risks: Conceptual and practical insights (2002, background): “Often the performance of portfolio managers or even business units is measured by the ratio of (expected) profits and the amount of risk capital needed to sustain the portfolio; see, for example, Jorion (2001).”
- Predicting Hedge Fund Failure: A Comparison of Risk Measures (2009, unknown): “previous research that finds performance as an important factor in predicting hedge fund failure (Liang (2000), BGP (2001), Malkiel and Saha (2005), and Chan et al.”
- Nonparametric estimation of conditional VaR and expected shortfall (2008, background): “1 See, to name just a few, Morgan (1996), Duffie and Pan (1997), Jorion (2001) and Duffie and Singleton (2003) for financial background, statistical inferences, and various applications.”
- The Ten Commandments for Optimizing Value-at-Risk and Daily Capital Charges (2009, unknown): “models to calculate their Value-at-Risk (VaR) thresholds (see Jorion (2000) for a”
- Value-at-Risk for long and short trading positions (2003, background): “…and the well-publicized trading loss of well known financial institutions (see Jorion, 2000, for a brief history of these events) has led financial regulators and supervisory committee of banks to favor quantitative techniques which appraise the possible loss that these institutions can incur.”
- Generating synthetic data in finance: opportunities, challenges and pitfalls (2020, result): “Alternatively, the evaluation of certain quantities such as Value-at-Risk (VaR) [55] is “backtested”, whereby historical data for a time period is used to train a generative model, at which point the true VaR observed in the subsequent historical period is compared with that obtained by the generati”
- A comprehensive review of Value at Risk methodologies (2014, background): “As is well known, all these methodologies, usually called standard models, have numerous shortcomings, which have led to the development of new proposals (see Jorion, 2001).”