In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO

By R. Steinberg. International Organization, 2002

542 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ca07ca088afad63527cfa4ab8e1fb63cbb043d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Shamel Azmeh
2. Christopher Foster
3. Jaime Echávarri
4. R. Keohane
5. Thomas Oatley

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Shamel Azmeh
2. A. Moravcsik
3. Christopher Foster
4. Jaime Echávarri
5. R. Keohane

In Political Science and International Relations

1. R. Keohane
2. S. Macedo
3. Shamel Azmeh
4. A. Moravcsik
5. Christopher Foster
6. E. Hafner-Burton

Citations in the corpus

• The International Trade Regime and the Quest for Free Digital Trade (2019, background): “…the international trade regime in reaching their objectives is often seen as a confirmation of realist perspectives of international organizations as pure reflections of the distribution of power and vehicles for the powerful states to reach their goals (Haggard and Simmons 1987; Steinberg 2002).”
• Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization (2014, unknown): “The agenda-setting process that takes place between the launch and conclusion of a round is critical to determining its final outcome and the time when powerful countries flex their muscles (Steinberg, 2002).”
• Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism (2009, background): “…the International Trade Commission, are also subject to constraints from the multilateral trade regime+ 33+ See Steinberg 2004; and Goldstein and Steinberg 2007+ 34+ Steinberg 2002+ 35+ Parker 1999, 46– 47+ the WTO’s dispute settlement process is trade-biased,” by making the WTO’s approach to…”