Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation and Growth
By Leonid Kogan, Dimitris Papanikolaou, Amit Seru, Noah Stoffman. 2017
942 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c981edf35c5f52bc609ef4216db62de5acdf935
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- X. Tian
- Miguel A. Ferreira
- Song Ma
- Pedro Matos
- Thomas J. Chemmanur
- Po-Hsuan Hsu
- Germán Gutiérrez
- Kai Li
In Economics and Econometrics
- Miguel A. Ferreira
- Pedro Matos
- Song Ma
- X. Tian
- Thomas Philippon
- Germán Gutiérrez
- Cláudia Custódio
- Po-Hsuan Hsu
Citations in the corpus
- What Is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent “Lottery” (2019, positive): “Finally, previous empirical tests of the Schumpeterian hypothesis linking innovation to economic growth report large positive effects of patented inventions on firm growth and productivity (Kogan et al. 2017).”
- Corruption and Corporate Innovation (2019, neutral): “First, as with the National Bureau of Economic Research patent data, the Kogan et al. (2017) data only include patent applications that have been granted.”
- Technological links and predictable returns (2019, neutral): “This matched dataset is generously provided by Kogan et al. (2017).(10) Specifically, Kogan et al.”
- Do General Managerial Skills Spur Innovation? (2017, background): “Lerner and Wulf (2007) and Tian and Wang (2014) provide evidence consistent with this idea.”
- How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? (2016, positive): “In Column 7 the dependent variable is the market value of new patents applied for during the year, calculated as the market responses to the patents’ approval following Kogan et al., (2017) .”
- The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation (2019, positive): “When we cannot match an observation in our MSCI sample with an observation in the patent database developed by Kogan et al. (2017), we assume the firm had no patents.”