Cooperative communications with relay-selection: when to cooperate and whom to cooperate with?
By Ahmed Salah Ibrahim, Ahmed Kamel Sadek, Weifeng Su, K. Liu. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2008
555 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c90f007d5be513a88274c5a4e2f93722f8a089b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Beibei Wang
- K. Liu
- Zhu Han
- K. Kwak
- S. M. Riazul Islam
- Ioannis Krikidis
- Octavia A. Dobre
- Nurilla Avazov
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Beibei Wang
- Octavia A. Dobre
- K. Kwak
- S. M. Riazul Islam
- K. Liu
- Zhu Han
- Ioannis Krikidis
- Nurilla Avazov
Citations in the corpus
- Distributed Relay Selection and Power Control for Multiuser Cooperative Communication Networks Using Stackelberg Game (2009, background): “The proposed approach not only helps the source find the relays at relatively better locations and “buy” an optimal amount of power from the relays, but also helps the competing relays maximize their own utilities by asking the optimal prices.”
- Power-Domain Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) in 5G Systems: Potentials and Challenges (2016, background): “In wireless networks, cooperative communications has gained a great deal of attention due to the ability to offer spatial diversity to mitigate fading, while resolving the difficulties of mounting multiple antennas on small communications terminals [22].”
- Buffer-Aided Relay Selection for Cooperative Diversity Systems without Delay Constraints (2012, background): “The selected relay forwards the received data (in case of a successful decoding) immediately in the next time slot to the destination and therefore the ability of the relays to store at least a limited number of data packets is not elaborated.”