Optimization Beyond the Convolution: Generalizing Spatial Relations with End-to-End Metric Learning
By Philipp Jund, Andreas Eitel, Nichola Abdo, Wolfram Burgard. 2017
19 citations recorded by the source corpus.
To operate intelligently in domestic environments, robots require the ability to understand arbitrary spatial relations between objects and to generalize them to objects of varying sizes and shapes. In this work, we present a novel end-to-end approach to generalize spatial relations based on distance metric learning. We train a neural network to transform 3D point clouds of objects to a metric space that captures the similarity of the depicted spatial relations, using only geometric models of the objects. Our approach employs gradient-based optimization to compute object poses in order to imitate an arbitrary target relation by reducing the distance to it under the learned metric. Our results based on simulated and real-world experiments show that the proposed method enables robots to generalize spatial relations to unknown objects over a continuous spectrum.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Oliver Kroemer
- Scott Niekum
- George Dimitri Konidaris
- Sergey Levine
- Andy Zeng
- Peter R. Florence
- Jonathan Tompson
- Vikas Sindhwani
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Andy Zeng
- Johnny Lee
- Peter R. Florence
- Jonathan Tompson
- Luc Van Gool
- Jitendra Malik
- Vikas Sindhwani
- Scott Niekum
Citations in the corpus
- Transporter Networks: Rearranging the Visual World for Robotic Manipulation (2020, background): “, object keypoints [3, 4, 5, 6], embeddings [7, 8], or dense descriptors [9, 10, 11] – has been shown to improve sample efficiency [10].”
- A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithms (2019, background): “Finally, objects may vary in their interactions or relative properties, including both robot-object [26, 209] and object-object [358, 362, 220, 183] interactions.”