ENDEMICS–AREA RELATIONSHIPS: THE INFLUENCE OF SPECIES DOMINANCE AND SPATIAL AGGREGATION

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A THEORY OF SPATIAL STRUCTURE IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES AT MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES (2005, methodology): “Coleman (1981) extended the reach of the random model, developing a general framework for deriving the shape of the species–area relationship under arbitrary species-abundance distributions, while Green and Ostling (2003) derived the form of an endemics–area relationship under the random model.”
Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. (2008, background): “First of all, evenness alters the number of species per unit area (or volume) by altering the shape of species–area relationships (SARs) (He and Legendre 2002, Green and Ostling 2003).”
Spatial distributions of tree species in a subtropical forest of China (2009, background): “An example of this is He and Legendre (2002) and Green and Ostling (2003) who show that spatial patterns of individual species would significantly affect species area and endemics area relationships, respectively.”
Species Richness, Abundance, and Composition of Ground-Dwelling Ants in Northern California Grasslands: Role of Plants, Soil, and Grazing (2005, background): “Theoretically, a numerically dominant species will reduce the diversity for a given area, but its impact on diversity is not always straightforward (Green and Ostling 2003).”