Methods for Studying Morphological Integration and Modularity

By A. Goswami, P. D. Polly. 2010

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Geometry and Topology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c7bba2d3e0485d01a5aa2d3d6fc47ff009927c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. C. Klingenberg

In Geometry and Topology

1. C. Klingenberg
2. F. James Rohlf
3. Dean C. Adams
4. P. Gunz
5. P. Mitteroecker
6. P. D. Polly

In Paleontology

1. C. Klingenberg
2. P. Mitteroecker
3. P. Gunz

Citations in the corpus

• Analyzing Fluctuating Asymmetry with Geometric Morphometrics: Concepts, Methods, and Applications (2015, background): “After some pioneering studies of integration in fluctuating asymmetry [400,401], interest in the topic grew quickly since the late 1990s, mostly in the context of evolutionary developmental biology, where analyses of covariation of fluctuating asymmetry, particularly in combination with the methods ”
• Evaluating modularity in morphometric data: challenges with the RV coefficient and a new test measure (2016, unknown): “…accompanied by changes in other traits that are affected by common mechanisms such as functional activities, genetic linkages, pleiotropy, or common developmental pathways (Wagner 1984a; Cheverud 1996; Bookstein et al. 2003; Mitteroecker & Bookstein 2007; Klingenberg 2008; Goswami & Polly 2010).”