Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Developing a framework for responsible innovation* (2013, background): “Following Callon’s account of innovation as ‘society in the making’ (Callon, 1987), we can see that implications are ‘systemic’, coming from the interplay of the technical and the social (Hellström, 2003).”
Innovating Innovation Policy: The emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’ (2015, background): “…Society (Stirling 2006), and in the framing of questions about multilevel governance of emergent fields such as nanotechnology, and what might constitute socially responsible innovation in the face of unknown risk (see, for example, Hellström 2003, EC 2010a, Owen and Goldberg 2010, Grunwald 2012).”
Innovation policy: What, why, and how (2017, background): “…as anticipation, participation, deliberation, transparency—to ensure that the process and direction of R&D and innovation better take into account societal preferences and concerns around ethics, sustainability, etc. (Hellström, 2003; Owen et al. , 2012; Stilgoe et al. , 2013; Von Schomberg, 2013).”
Twenty challenges to innovation studies (2015, background): “It has given rise to a call for 'responsible innovation' (e.g. Hellström, 2003).”