Damage evolution and failure mechanisms in additively manufactured stainless steel

By Holly D. Carlton, A. Haboub, G. Gallegos, D. Parkinson, A. MacDowell. 2016

285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Corrosion performance of additively manufactured stainless steel parts: A review (2020, methodology): “Different classes of SS such as precipitation hardening stainless steels [7], tool steels [8], austenitic stainless steels [9], and maraging steels [10] are frequently used in additive manufacturing (AM).”
Steels in additive manufacturing: A review of their microstructure and properties (2020, result): “Although some works report lower fracture toughness and elongation to failure (as low as 12%) for L-PBF produced stainless steel as compared to wrought material [26,50] (typically: 40–50%), most studies report a higher elongation to failure and fracture toughness (up to 67%) [27,29,38,42,48,51].”
Effects of hot isostatic pressing on the elastic modulus and tensile properties of 316L parts made by powder bed laser fusion (2017, methodology): “Carlton et al, [32], also test a wrought specimen and find a UTS 545MPa, YS of 245MPA and an elongation of 55%.”
Additive manufacturing of steels: a review of achievements and challenges (2020, background): “[92] Carlton HD, Haboub A, Gallegos GF, Parkinson DY, MacDowell AA (2016) Damage evolution and failure”
Additive manufacturing of metals (2016, methodology): “[56] AF A 590 ± 17 705 ± 15 44 ± 7 AN (1095 /1 h/Vacuum þ ArC) A 375 ± 11 635 ± 17 51 ± 3”