Monitoring Plant and Animal Populations

By T. Edwards. 2002

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Empirical estimate of the reliability of the use of the Point-Centred Quarter Method (PCQM) : solutions to ambiguous field situations and description of the PCQM+ protocol (2006, methodology): “vegetational relevé methods exist (cf. Kent and Coker, 1992; Elzinga et al., 2001).”
Worldwide impact of alien parrots (Aves Psittaciformes) on native biodiversity and environment: a review (2014, background): “Parrots are not yet included among the species causing the heaviest agriculture damages in Europe (CRAMP & SIMMONS 1980), but cross-border monitoring programs (ELZINGA et al. 2001) are highly recommended, to prevent economic losses (cf.”
Population recovery patterns of Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching (2010, methodology): “, exponentially) rather than a constant amount (Thompson et al., 1998; Elzinga et al., 2001).”
Using subsets of species in biodiversity surveys (2007, background): “In addition, by reducing the need for a high level of taxonomic expertise, sampling a subset of species can reduce the complexity and cost of monitoring programmes, which are critical to their effectiveness (Elzinga et al. 2001).”
Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance (2011, background): “The quality of both data and results are central to the reliability of the answers to any question evaluated quantitatively (Elzinga et al., 2001).”