PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS SOCIETY 34th ANNUAL MEETING-195'0 STATUS OR RECOMMENDATION: SELECTING THE TYPE OF INFORMATION FOR DECISION AIDING

By B. Coury. 2011

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation (2014, background): “Yet four studies represented single-task studies (Crocoll & Coury, 1990; Endsley & Kaber, 1999; Endsley & Kiris, 1995; Kaber et al., 2000).”
From Here to Autonomy (2017, background): “…making (making recommendations on what course of action to take, for example) has been found to be problematic due to a decisionbiasing effect (Crocoll & Coury, 1990; Endsley et al., 2003; Lorenz, Di Nocera, Rottger, & Parasuraman, 2002; Reichenbach, Onnasch, & Manzey, 2011; Sarter &…”
Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration (2010, background): “Whereas the former effect parallels the findings concerning the impact of status versus command displays on automation bias in aviation (Crocoll & Coury, 1990; Sarter & Schroeder, 2001; see earlier discussion), the latter corresponds to the impact of reliability on compla-cency effects in…”