Electoral Systems and Public Spending

By G. Milesi-Ferretti, Roberto Perotti, M. Rostagno. Social Science Research Network, 2002

764 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study the effects of electoral institutions on the size and composition of public expenditure in OECD and Latin American countries. We emphasize the distinction between purchases of goods and services, which are easier to target geographically, and transfers, which are easier to target across social groups. We present a theoretical model in which voters anticipating government policymaking under different electoral systems have an incentive to elect representatives more prone to transfer (public good) spending in proportional (majoritarian) systems. The model also predicts higher total primary spending in proportional (majoritarian) systems when the share of transfer spending is high (low). After defining rigorous measures of proportionality to be used in the empirical investigation, we find considerable support for our predictions.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c1e9bd765556c0df139e00426e8bbdca85212c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Toke S. Aidt
  2. Peter Sandholt Jensen
  3. Torsten Persson
  4. Guido Tabellini
  5. A. Mody
  6. Stefania Fabrizio
  7. Marius R. Busemeyer
  8. Christian Breunig

In Political Science and International Relations

  1. Peter Sandholt Jensen
  2. Toke S. Aidt
  3. Torsten Persson
  4. Guido Tabellini
  5. Marius R. Busemeyer
  6. Serena Lamartina
  7. Andrea Zaghini
  8. Eric Kramon

Citations in the corpus