Maintenance Olaparib for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
By T. Golan, P. Hammel, M. Reni, E. Van Cutsem, T. Macarulla, M. Hall, Joon-Oh Park, D. Hochhauser, D. Arnold, D. Oh and 9 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2019
1,834 citations recorded by the source corpus.
BACKGROUND Patients with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation make up a small subgroup of those with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib has had antitumor activity in this population. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients who had a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and metastatic pancreatic cancer and disease that had not progressed during first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, to receive maintenance olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival, which was assessed by blinded independent central review. RESULTS Of the 3315 patients who underwent screening, 154 underwent randomization and were assigned to a trial intervention (92 to receive olaparib and 62 to receive placebo). The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (7.4 months vs. 3.8 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.82; P = 0.004). An interim analysis of overall survival, at a data maturity of 46%, showed no difference between the olaparib and placebo groups (median, 18.9 months vs. 18.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.46; P = 0.68). There was no significant between-group difference in health-related quality of life, as indicated by the overall change from baseline in the global quality-of-life score (on a 100-point scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life) based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (between-group difference, −2.47 points; 95% CI, −7.27 to 2.33). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 40% in the olaparib group and 23% in the placebo group (between-group difference, 16 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.02 to 31); 5% and 2% of the patients, respectively, discontinued the trial intervention because of an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a germline BRCA mutation and metastatic pancreatic cancer, progression-free survival was longer with maintenance olaparib than with placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca and others; POLO ClinicalTrials.gov number, .)
Subfields: Oncology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c0beb934d1975501100f7fec8ee5e777cd12965
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Oncology
Citations in the corpus
- Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: A report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. (2020, background): “Patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presented a longer PFS with maintenance olaparib.(111,112) In advanced PDAC with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, an increased response with PARPi has been reported in few patients included in a prospective trial.”
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. (2021, background): “Adverse events, such as those grade 3 or higher, were found to be higher in the olaparib arm than in the placebo arm (40% vs 23%).(195) Based on this data, olaparib is recommended by the NCCN Panel as a preferred targeted maintenance therapy for patients with germline BRCAmutated metastatic disease ”
- PARP Inhibitors: Clinical Relevance, Mechanisms of Action and Tumor Resistance (2020, background): “8 months following Olaparib and control drug treatments, respectively (Golan et al., 2019).”
- Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. (2020, neutral): “(%)¶ Enzalutamide only 68 (42) 40 (48) 105 (41) 54 (41) Abiraterone only 62 (38) 29 (35) 100 (39) 54 (41) Enzalutamide and abiraterone 32 (20) 14 (17) 51 (20) 23 (18) Previous taxane use — no.”