Evolving multimodal controllers with HyperNEAT
By Justin K. Pugh, Kenneth O. Stanley. 2013
25 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics & Control, Evolutionary Computation
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Mengjie Zhang
- Trevor Darrell
- Bing Xue
- Pieter Abbeel
- Quoc V. Le
- Yanan Sun
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
In Mechanical Engineering
- Kenneth O. Stanley
- Lisa B. Soros
- Trevor Darrell
- Jeff Clune
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Sebastian Risi
- Shimon Whiteson
- Jean-Baptiste Mouret
In Robotics & Control
- Lisa B. Soros
- Anna Rohrbach
- Frederic Besse
- Daan Wierstra
- Trevor Darrell
- Kenneth O. Stanley
- Kaiyong Zhao
- Sergey Levine
In Evolutionary Computation
- Lisa B. Soros
- Chrisantha Fernando
- Xin He
- Bing Xue
- Mengjie Zhang
- Daan Wierstra
- Gary G. Yen
- Kenneth O. Stanley
Citations in the corpus
- AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art (2019, background): “some studies [116, 117, 118, 25] describe the use of indirect encoding schemes to represent the network.”
- Convolution by Evolution: Differentiable Pattern Producing Networks (2016, background): “…layers of a deeper neural network then there are two possibilities, either an extra input is given signaling which layer of weights the CPPN is outputting [19], or the CPPN is constrained to always have multiple output nodes, with a specific node outputting the weight for its assigned layer [21].”
- Identifying Necessary Conditions for Open-Ended Evolution through the Artificial Life World of Chromaria (2014, methodology): “Recall also that each Chromarian contains two CPPNs : one to encode its neural network, and the other to encode its morphology.”
- Gradient-free Policy Architecture Search and Adaptation (2017, background): “Most of them are based on biological genetics algorithms where there is a fitness function that gets re-evaluated at each “generation” to determine whether “genotypes” are perturbed in the correct direction to evolve appropriately [12, 11, 19, 17].”
- Large-Scale Evolution of Image Classifiers (2017, unknown): “…> . liest such “neuro-discovery” methods was neuro-evolution (Miller et al., 1989; Stanley & Miikkulainen, 2002; Stanley, 2007; Bayer et al., 2009; Stanley et al., 2009; Breuel & Shafait, 2010; Pugh & Stanley, 2013; Kim & Rigazio, 2015; Zaremba, 2015; Fernando et al., 2016; Morse & Stanley, 2016).”
- Evolving Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification (2017, background): “combined with the compositional pattern producing networks [29], was proposed to evolve a larger scale neural network with an indirect encoding strategy. Motivated by the HyperNEAT, multiple variants [30]–[32] were proposed to evolve even larger scale neural networks. However, the major deficiencies ”